Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Thoughts on "Drag Me to Hell"

In the field that it’s set for itself, it works flawlessly. Sam Raimi digs deep into his bag of horror movie tricks and he doesn’t give a damn about character, psychology, depth, or any panty-waist notion of 'logic.' He wants to scare the crap out of you. It’s a movie that is absolutely single-minded in pursuit of that goal. There’s not a detail that doesn’t support the director’s intent of making sure you have a ball. Raimi works in the conventions of the horror movie, and pushes them as far as they can go. (In short - that means 'bodily fluids.')

It’s a film that has been engineered as methodically as any ride at Universal Studios - a piece of mass entertainment, so lovingly crafted and technically brilliant that it touches art.

See it in a movie theatre if you can. There is a communal aspect to screaming your lungs out at something scary which DVD just can't touch.


WayneInNYC said...

David, dearest-

I think you're drastically oversimplifying things. It's a DEEPLY complex film.

Except for the anvil thing. I could swear I saw the word ACME on it.

Personally, I was horrified at what lengths that bank whore went to just to save her own pork-rind scented hide.

Here kitty, kitty... *indeed.*


P.S. I miss you, Can we set up a play date soon?

WayneInNYC said...


I caught Drusilla at the computer AGAIN! She was hitting *Send* and the screen returned to your blog

I hate it when she uses my log-in information without my permission.

I hope she didn't say/send anything *too* catty.


David Johnston said...


I still have welts on my calves from my little "accident" while Wayne was in Texas.

I'm ready for a "play date" with you again whenever you're ready.

Whenever you're ready, kitty.